l’atelier

les derniers posts modifiés

page construite avec le plugin tangible template : 3 derniers post modifiés, articles complets et une navigation.

Je n’arrête pas de modifier les posts. C’est comme ça. Du coup, j’ai fait cette page, qui affiche les derniers posts modifiés. C’est l’atelier. C’est à ça que je travaille en ce moment….

<div id="content" class="tt-loop site-content">
  <Loop type=post paged=5 orderby=modified order=desc>
    <article class="tt-item post type-post status-publish format-standard  {Field post_class}">
      <header class="entry-header">
        <a href="{Field url}"><h2 class="entry-title default-max-width"><Field title /></h2></a>					</header>
      <div class="entry-content"><Field content/></div>
      <footer class="tt-item-footer default-max-width">
        <Field publish_date date_format="d-m-Y H:i:s" /> - <a href="{Date format='/Y/m/'}">Lire les posts de ce mois</a> -
        <Loop taxonomy=category post=current><a href="{Field url}"><Field title /></a> </Loop>
        <Loop taxonomy=tag post=current><a href="{Field url}">#<Field title /></a> </Loop>
        <If user_field=name is value="{Field author_name}">
          <a href="{Field edit_url}">- Modifier</a>
        </If></footer>
    </article>  
  </Loop>
   <div class="navigation post-navigation"><PaginateButtons /></div>
</div>

ai no korrida

https://pleine-peau.com/between_the_links/Ai_no_Korrida.htm

code, as art, as love, as war, as death. as image, as text.
code as movie. as move me. as the image you once gave me.
as the letters you once wrote to me.
code as sex. code as hidden.
code as hidden texts.
as love letters.

<title>Ai no Korrida</title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
.movexy {
	border: 1px solid #999999;
	cursor: move;
}
-->
</style>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgcolor="#4B4B4B"
background=Ai_no_Korrida/lacinkbackgrV2.gif text=#f7e1c1 link=#ffffff vLink=#ffffff aLink=#070745 onLoad="MM_dragLayer('Layer3','',0,0,0,0,true,false,-1,-1,-1,-1,false,false,0,'',false,'')">
<TABLE border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 background="Ai_no_Korrida/aino.jpg">

<TBODY>

<TR>

<TD><IMG hspace=4 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0></TD>
<TD><IMG hspace=20 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0></TD>
<TD vAlign=center align="right" style="line-height: 1.2pt;	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);
	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;	font-size: 11px;"><FONT color="#ff2100"><I>Ai no
      Korrida:</I><BR>
the Cutting Edge of<BR>
Feminine Eroticism</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD><IMG hspace=30 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0></TD>
</TR>

<TR>

<TD></TD>
<TD></TD>
<TD colSpan=10 style="line-height: 1.2pt;	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);><A href="http://lacan.com/biosB.htm#tremeau"
      target=_top><FONT color="#ff2100" size=+1>F<FONT
      color="#ff2100" size=-1>ABIEN<FONT color=#ff1200
      size=+1> T<FONT color="#ff2100" size=-1>RÉMEAU</A>
</TD>
<TD></TD>
</TR>

<TR>

<TD rowspan="2" valign="top"></TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top"></TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" bgcolor="#082908" style="line-height: 1.2pt; Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20); color: 'f7e1c1';	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: '13px';"><A 
      href="http://www.kinoaero.cz/archiv/content/detail-filmuF_cont.phtml?id=135"
      target=_top><IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aino.jpg" width="200" height="108" border=0 align=left></A>
      <I>Ai no korrida</I> is the Japanese title of the movie, <I>In the Realm
      of the Senses</I>, by Oshima Nagisa. Even though Oshima preferred the
      French title <I>L'Empire des sens</I>, for its closeness to the title of
      Roland Barthes' book <I>L'Empire des signes</I>, we think that the
      Japanese title deserves more attention. <I>Ai no korrida</I>, whose
      translation is <I>Corrida of love</I>, contains the idea of kill; the kill
      of what? the kill of the hero, of course; yet why not the kill of
      love?<BR>
<IMG hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0><I>In
      the Realm of the Senses</I> became famous for its last scene — a scene of
      castration —, but I regard the turning point as the killing of the hero,
      Kichiso, leading the heroine to what Lacan calls the feminine
      <I>jouissance</I>.<BR>
<IMG hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif"
      border=0>This article intends to show how Lacan's teaching can elucidate
      the movie's framework and conversely, perhaps above all, but also, how the
      movie illustrates some of Lacan's ideas about <I>jouissance</I>,
      especially those developed in the Seminar XX — <I>Encore</I> (1972-73). So
      far no other films have achieved this lacanian uniqueness.

<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
At the movie's end, Kichi, after all their feats, lies completely
      exhausted; Sada, with her same appetite, is on the watch.<BR>
<IMG
      hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>The strangulation
      that occurred during their sexual intercourses has brought them close to
      death. Then, Kichi gives Sada this specific order regarding strangulation:
      "If you start, don't stop in the middle, it hurts too much afterwards."
      One can recognize the expression of the super-ego, "<I>jouis</I>!"
      addressed to Sada, where exactly it is only implied. There are three times
      in Kichi's imperative: the beginning, the middle, and "afterwards," which
      is in fact the final cause <I>a contrario</I> (the reason why she should
      not stop). Death and <I>jouissance</I> are indisputably present in this
      sentence. At the same time, their temporality, the very end of the act, is
      missing. In the following scene of Kichi's death, Sada is initiated to a
      new kind of <I>jouissance</I>. This is the only instance when Sada obtains
      <I>jouissance</I> detached from any sexual act; whereas previously, Sada
      strangulates Kichi during their love making, she now shows a complete
      disinterest in his penis. Initially the next scene appears enigmatic: Sada
      lies naked amid the benches of an open-air theater; a little girl running
      after an old man, playing hide-and-seek keeps asking: "Are you ready?" The
      old man answers: "Not yet," until he suddenly disappears. This scene may
      be understood as Sada's fantasy — the death, the killing of her
      father.<BR>
<div id="Layer2" style="position:absolute; width:100%; z-index:2; filter:invert; background-color: #F7E1C1; layer-background-color: #F7E1C1; border: 1px none #000000;">&nbsp;<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>

</TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" style="line-height: 1.5pt;	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=40, Strength=20);font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;	font-size: 12px;">[...]

<IMG hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif"
      border=0>These scenes correlate with what Lacan taught about fantasy as
      the last defense against <I>jouissance</I>. Sada's fundamental fantasy
      arises at the same time it is passed over (one may refer to the
      <I>Aufhebung</I> here), leading her to a <I>jouissance</I> one should no
      longer call sexual, but rather "a glance at feminine <I>jouissance</I>."
      In the following scene Sada castrates Kichi's corpse. As Lacan points out,
      this scene conveys a certain strangeness and questions the psychoanalytic
      concept of castration: "Here we see clearly that castration is not a
      fantasy. Castration cannot be placed so easily in the function that it has
      in psychoanalysis, since it may be fantasized."<A
      href="#footnote"><FONT color="#ff2100"
      size=-2><SUP>1</SUP></FONT></A><A name=1><BR>
</TD>
<TD valign="top" style="line-height: 1.2pt;	font-size:18px;Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;"><IMG
      hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>She cuts his penis
      first, then his testicles. No question, her knife follows the anatomic
      section; she cuts the anatomic male organ. What value does it acquire
      then, far away from its sexual use? The emasculated corpse of Kichi, in
      its connection with the Other, the father of the fantasy, represents the
      barred Other (<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif">) and the useless
      genital organ she now possesses is the signifier of this <IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif">: S(<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif"
      border=0>). Sada reaches the other <I>jouissance</I>, the feminine
      <I>jouissance</I>, specified by its relation with S(<IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>). 
<div id="Layer3" style="position:absolute; filter:alpha(opacity=55); left: 413px; top: 218px; background-color: #FFFFFF; layer-background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 1px none #000000;" class="movexy"><IMG width="200" height="108" src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0></div>
<br>
<IMG       src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" hspace=10 border=0>The difference between the two
      <I>jouissances</I> is also evoked by the terminology of the script, when a
      voice-over states that Sada, holding his sex in her hand, roamed the
      streets of Tokyo for four days with a resplendent face: it is no longer
      question of happiness (<I>ureshii</I>) but of resplendence
      (<I>hareyakana</I>): which in Japanese first refers to a clear, cloudless
      sky. In that way, Sada approaches certain mystics .<BR>
In connection to what has
      gone before, I would like to make a few comments on Lacan's
      schema:<A href="#footnote"><FONT
      color="#ff2100" size=-2><SUP>2</SUP></FONT></A>

<br>
<br>

<CENTER>

<IMG height=172 src="Ai_no_Korrida/ai1.gif"
      width=332 border=0 style="filter:alpha(opacity:500)">
</CENTER>
<br>
<br>
The left side concerns the male inscription, and the right, the female
      inscription. For Kichi, sexual <I>jouissance</I> is associated with the
      fantasy that he responds to Sada's <I>demande</I> by giving himself over
      to Sada's sexual games.
</TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" background="Ai_no_Korrida/aino.jpg" style="line-height: 1.2pt;	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);
	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;	font-size: 11px;"><A name=2><IMG hspace=10
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>His fantasy supports his
      <I>jouissance</I>, at the same time his <I>jouissance</I> builds up his
      fantasy. What Kichi grasps of the Other, incorporated in Sada, is his
      <I>objet a</I>: "It (<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/ais.gif" align=bottom
      border=0> in the masculine position) can never reach its sexual partner,
      which is the Other, except by way of mediation, as the cause of its
      desire."<A href="#footnote"><FONT
      color="#ff2100" size=-2><SUP>3</SUP></FONT></A><A name=3>
      On the other hand, Sada shows this duality: she has a rapport to the
      sexual <I>jouissance</I>, <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/la.gif" align=bottom
      border=0> —&gt; <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/f.gif" align=bottom border=0>,
      and, as she is inscribed on the side of the "<I>pas-toute</I>," she has
      rapport to the feminine <I>jouissance</I>, demonstrated by the end of the
      movie, <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/la.gif" align=bottom border=0> —&gt;
      S(<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" align=bottom border=0>). From this,
      three points can be raised: 1 — The position of fantasy is very specific
      in the case of Sada: it plays the role of a defense against feminine
      <I>jouissance</I>. It would be the bar separating the phallic
      <I>jouissance</I> (for women) from the feminine <I>jouissance</I>:</TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" background="Ai_no_Korrida/aino.jpg" style="line-height: 1.4pt;
	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=2, LightStrength=20, Phase=30, Strength=10);font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;	font-size: 13px;">
<CENTER>

<div id="Layer1" style="position:relative; z-index:1"><IMG height=87 alt=schema src="Ai_no_Korrida/ai2.gif"
      width=155 border=0></div>
</CENTER>
<br><br><br>
<br>
2 — The place of castration can be revised. For men, castration is a
      prerequisite: man can approach woman, because he is castrated; "...short
      of castration, that is, short of something which says <I>no</I> to the
      phallic function, man has no chance of enjoying the body of the woman, in
      other words, of making love."<A
      href="#footnote"><FONT color="#ff2100"
      size=-2><SUP>4</SUP></FONT></A><A name=4> Castration is,
      for man, the ratio of the paternal function, <IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/exfx.gif" border=0>, with the phallic function,
      <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/axfx.gif" border=0>. For Sada, castration
      comes last, as part of the real that constitutes S (A); and, in that
      sense, we can consider castration as part of the real that constitutes
      S(<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>), and in that sense one
      can say that castration is her "anti-fantasy." Castration allows Sada to
      rid herself of her fundamental fantasy, <IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/ais.gif" border=0> —&gt; a. Thus she reaches the
      feminine <I>jouissance</I>, <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/la.gif" border=0>
      —&gt; S(<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>) In that way,
      castration can be conceived of as the passing from the "<I>semblant
      d'être</I>" to S(<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>):</TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" style="line-height: 1.2pt; 	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;
	font-size: 33px;">
<CENTER>
<IMG height=23 alt=schema src="Ai_no_Korrida/ai3.gif"
      width=109 border=0>
</CENTER>
<br>
<br>
<IMG hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>3 — why
      does S(<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>) lie below the
      female inscription in Lacan's schema? Should it not be exterior to the
      male and female inscriptions? One can say that it is the logical
      consequence of three lacanian propositions:<BR>
<IMG hspace=10
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>a — woman is basically the
      Other in the sexual act<BR>
<IMG hspace=10
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>b — the Other is the treasure
      of signifiers<BR>
<IMG hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif"
      border=0>c — there is no Other of the Other.<BR>
</TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" style="line-height: 1.2pt;
	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);
	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;
	font-size: 11px;"><IMG hspace=10
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif" border=0>The S(<IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>) occupies a specific position in
      woman: a position of "extimity."<A
      href="#footnote"><FONT color="#ff2100"
      size=-2><SUP>5</SUP></FONT></A><A name=5> One encounters
      a further difficulty: woman considered as a subject cannot be called the
      Other, A, nor can she not be a divided subject, <IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/ais.gif" border=0>. But with respect to
      <I>jouissance</I>, Lacan seems to say that one cannot disregard conceiving
      of woman as A, nor simply conceive of her as <IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/ais.gif" border=0>. For this reason, Lacan writes:
      "<IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/la.gif" border=0>," which is neither A, nor
      <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/ais.gif" border=0>. From this, one can
      understand that the question of the relation between woman and A leads
      Lacan towards the concept of God; and, the question of the relation
      between woman and <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/ais.gif" border=0> leads
      Lacan towards the question of the unconscious in women. Moreover, the fact
      that <IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/la.gif" border=0> —&gt; S(<IMG
      src="Ai_no_Korrida/aia.gif" border=0>) stays within the female
      inscription indicates that feminine <I>jouissance</I> is "<I>jouissance de
      l'un</I>."<BR>
</TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" style="line-height: 1.2pt; 	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;
	font-size: 11px;"><IMG hspace=10 src="Ai_no_Korrida/SINGLEP.gif"
      border=0>I could finish this article by congratulating the actress, Eiko
      Matsuda, for her exceptional performance, and Oshima Nagisa for his
      masterpiece. But discrediting the male role, as I have earlier, for
      example by simply labelling Kichi as obsessional, may be a pitfall of the
      film. His apparent passivity should not mask that it is Kichi who
      introduces strangling into their love games, and the one who asks Sada to
      kill him. One could say without a Kichi, no Sada (also, without a Sada, no
      Kichi). Kichi loses everything: his strength, his life, and even beyond
      death, his genitals. In fact, as the action progresses, one comes to
      understand his position as the same as Sada's: their refusal of the
      "<I>semblant</I>" associated with the sexual <I>jouissance</I>. He
      gradually erects it to an ethical position. He becomes conscious that
      there is no escape from sexual <I>jouissance</I> within the realm of love,
      conscious that he will not become what she is about to reach, or in other
      words, he becomes conscious of the inexistence of sexual relation.
      Therefore, he is the order addressed to Sada; "Jouis!," as the only chance
      to escape their <I>jouissance</I>. </TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" style="line-height: 1.5pt; 	Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);	font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono;
	font-size: 11px;">Notes<BR>
<FONT size=-1><A name=footnote>
1. Jacques
      Lacan, <I>Le Sinthome, Ornicar?</I> n. #9, p. 38; "C'est là qu'on voit
      bien que la castration, ce n'est pas le fantasme. Elle n'est pas facile a
      situer dans la fonction qui est la sienne dans l'analyse, puisqu'elle peut
      être fantasmatisée." <A href="#1"><FONT
      color="#ff2100">back up</FONT></A><BR>
2. In <I>Feminine Sexuality — Jacques
      Lacan and the École Freudienne</I>, W.W. Norton &amp; Co., New York, 1982,
      p.149. <A href="#2"><FONT color="#ff2100">back
      up</FONT></A><BR>
3. ibid, p.151, <I>Encore</I>, p. 75. <A href="#3"><FONT color="#ff2100">back up</FONT></A><BR>
4. ibid, p. 143, <I>Encore</I>, p.67. <A
      href="#4"><FONT color="#ff2100">back
      up</FONT></A><BR>
5. We refer the reader to Jacques-Alain Miller's seminar
      "L'Extimité," 1985-86, unpublished. <A
      href="#4"><FONT color="#ff2100">back
      up</FONT></A> </TD>
<TD rowspan="2" valign="top" style="Filter: Wave(Add=0, Freq=5, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=20);"	><IMG src="Ai_no_Korrida/aino.jpg" height="600" border=0 align=left style="Filter: Wave(Add=1, Freq=0, LightStrength=20, Phase=20, Strength=0)"></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD ><a href="http://www.lacan.com/frameV2.htm"><img src="Ai_no_Korrida/aino.jpg"   width="332" border="0" style="Filter: invert" ></a>

</TD>
</TR>
<tr bgcolor="#141414">
<td colspan="13" bgcolor="#FF0000" height="20">

</td>
</tr>

</TBODY>
</TABLE>

</BODY>

to do

  • couleurs texte code (en rouge les tags html, en bleu ce qui est entre guillemets (les variables)

sur les traces de la lamelle

aux poignets, mes coupures, aux poignets, dans le creux de mes bras

La libidio est l’organe essentiel à comprendre la nature de la pulsion. Cet organe est irréel. Irréel n’est point imaginaire. L’irréel se définit de s’articuler au réel d’une façon qui nous échappe, et c’est justement ce qui nécessite que sa représentation soit mythique, comme nous la faisons. Mais d’être irréel, cela n’empêche pas un organe de s’incarner.
Je vous en donne tout de suite la matérialisation. Une des formes les plus antiques à incarner, dans le corps, cet organe irréel, c’est le tatouage, la scarification. L’entaille a bel et bien la fonction d’être pour l’Autre, d’y situer le sujet, marquant sa place dans le champ des relations du groupe, entre chacun et tous les autres. Et en même temps, elle a de façon évidente une fonction érotique, que tous ceux qui en ont approché la réalité ont perçue.
(Jacques Lacan, Le séminaire, Livre XI, p. 187)

mes coupures, pour l’Autre, y marquant ma place, comme sujet –

Chaque fois que se rompent les membranes de l’oeuf d’où va sortir le fœtus en passe de devenir un nouveau-né, imaginez un instant que quelque chose s’en envole, qu’on peut faire avec un œuf aussi qu’un homme, à savoir l’hommelette, ou la lamelle.

La lamelle, c’est quelque chose d’extra-plat, qui se déplace comme l’amibe. Simplement, c’est un peu plus compliqué. Mais ça passe partout. Et comme c’est quelque chose – je vous dirai tout à l’heure pourquoi – qui a à voir avec ce que l’être sexué perd dans la sexualité, c’est, comme est l’amibe par rapport aux êtres sexués, immortel. Puisque ça survit à toute division, puisque ça subsiste à toute intervention scissipare. Et ça court.

Eh bien! ça n’est pas rassurant. Supposez seulement que ça vienne vous envelopper le visage, pendant que vous dormez tranquillement…

Je vois mal comment nous n’entrerions pas en lutte avec un être capable de ces propriétés. Mais ça ne serait pas une lutte bien commode. Cette lamelle, cet organe, qui a pour caractéristique de ne pas exister, mais qui n’en est pas moins un organe – je pourrais vous donner plus de développement sur sa place zoologique – c’est la libido.

C’est la libido, en tant que pur instinct de vie, c’est-à-dire de vie immortelle, de vie irrépressible, de vie qui n’a besoin, elle, d’aucun organe, de vie simplifiée et indestructible. C’est ce qui est justement soustrait à l’être vivant de ce qu’il est soumis au cycle de la reproduction sexuée. Et c’est de cela que sont les représentants, les équivalents, toutes les formes que l’on peut énumérer de l’objet a. Les objets a n’en sont que les représentants, les figures. Le sein – comme équivoque, comme élément caractéristique de l’organisation mammifère, le placenta par exemple – représente bien cette part de lui-même que l’individu perd à la naissance, et qui peut servir à symboliser le plus profond objet perdu. Pour tous les autres objets, je pourrais évoquer la même référence.

(Jacques Lacan, Le séminaire, Livre XI, pp. 179,180)

Top